We used to be the land of the free and the home of the brave. Now we are the land of Helicopter Parents, Trigger Warnings, and Snowflakes. What happened?
However, there are many non-Republicans concerned with estrogen mimics. Alex Jones and Mother Jones are on the same page on this issue. Literally. I used to subscribe to Mother Jones to keep myself honest. Mother Jones may be vomitously lefty, but at least at the time, they brought data to the table, unlike today's CNN, MSNBC, etc. (Maybe they still do bring good data to the table. I haven't checked in a while.)
It requires 60% to get anything real through the Senate. So it is important to find issues where elements of Team D can cooperate with the Reactionary Agenda. Keep in mind that this country's top anti vaxx crusader is Robert Kennedy's son.
I'll admit I could be wrong, but the most logical conclusion we can derive from the current state of affairs (and history) is that there's an international, multi-generational, psychopathic mass murdering plutocratic clique intent on global depopulation and domination.
This attack is happening on multiple fronts, via "healthcare", the culture, finance, food, media, etc., and has been going on since at least the 1800's (and probably far longer). They operate by infiltration, subversion, threats, murder, and blackmail (often pedo-sexual).
Once you accept there's an "elite" group of plutocrats (e.g. the WEF) trying to kill you things get very clear.
There is an Elite which has more connectedness to elitists in other countries than they have with their own people. This was true for monarchs back in the middle ages as well.
There are intel agencies who try to compromise the potentially powerful with embarassing sexual incidents. This was routine for the KGB back in the day. As sexual mores have declined, they had to switch to underage bait for sufficient blackmail potential.
And yes, we live in times that resemble the scenario in C.S. Lewis' "That Hideous Strength."
But there is plenty of history of corporations poisoning people because those poisons happened to be very handy. CFCs and leaded gasoline were very useful chemicals. The creator of these chemicals absolutely knew that tetraethyl lead was dangerous; he got sick from it himself. He marketed it anyway because it made him a shit ton of money. Greed isn't always good.
Leaded gasoline got banned except for aviation gas. CFCs are being phased out. The EPA had bipartisan support when it was created. There is ample precedent for fixing this sort of problem.
The big challenge is convincing Republicans that they are shooting themselves in the foot by reflexively siding with big corporations. The EPA and the FDA can be royal pains in the ass, after all. But sometimes they serve critically useful functions.
The big challenge is getting around the global warming issue. There are plenty of reactionary elements within the environmental movement, but the Republicans have dug in their heels on the global warming threat. This heel digging makes first order sense, as global warming is a looming threat, not a crisis; and the solutions proposed by the Left are utterly moronic. But the key to winning the game of 4D chess is to come up with non-moronic solutions vs. deny the threat. Internal combustion engines can run on methanol. Indy cars used methanol back in the 70s. Methanol can be made from carbon dioxide and hydrogen gas. The remaining issue is where to get the electricity to make the hydrogen: solar? wind? thorium breeder reactors? or wait until we get fusion?
All valid points, but I think you need to go bigger, e.g.:
"But there is plenty of history of corporations poisoning people because those poisons happened to be very handy. CFCs and leaded gasoline were very useful chemicals. The creator of these chemicals absolutely knew that tetraethyl lead was dangerous; he got sick from it himself. He marketed it anyway because it made him a shit ton of money. Greed isn't always good."
Plenty of "health care" CEO's took the clotshot as well. Not everybody's in "the club", and "the club" isn't particularly interested in preserving members/aspiring members IMO. They're raving psychopaths, and are happy to eat their own. It's one reason they're losing, and will lose.
"The big challenge is convincing Republicans that they are shooting themselves in the foot by reflexively siding with big corporations. The EPA and the FDA can be royal pains in the ass, after all. But sometimes they serve critically useful functions."
While not as odious as Democraps, Repugnantcans are still plenty odious. This goes far beyond party politics. IMO the only way to succeed is to form sub-polities and raise up local elites to better positions, a la Neema Parvini (The Populist Delusion), and Hans Herman Hoppe (What Must Be Done).
"The big challenge is getting around the global warming issue."
We're heading into a mini-ice age so this won't be an issue in that sense, heheheh
> My intuition says that there is something real going on. I hear stories through my personal network that are consistent with a growth in autism.
At our local church, my wife and I run the nursery, taking care of toddler-aged kids so their parents can enjoy Sunday School in peace. Out of 10 kids at our current class, 2 of them are not speaking, both closing in fast on their 3rd birthdays. (Per normal child development, they should start talking somewhere between 10-18 months.) They also don't respond to being called by name.
I know. Small sample size and all the usual caveats. Still. 30 years ago you'd have never seen anything even close to 20%, even in a small sample!
This was an unexpected topic. I'm looking forward to Part 2.
The only error you make in this is assuming that once reasoned with, they will stop it
They won't, it's being done deliberately, for the purposes you outline.
Possibly correct.
However, there are many non-Republicans concerned with estrogen mimics. Alex Jones and Mother Jones are on the same page on this issue. Literally. I used to subscribe to Mother Jones to keep myself honest. Mother Jones may be vomitously lefty, but at least at the time, they brought data to the table, unlike today's CNN, MSNBC, etc. (Maybe they still do bring good data to the table. I haven't checked in a while.)
It requires 60% to get anything real through the Senate. So it is important to find issues where elements of Team D can cooperate with the Reactionary Agenda. Keep in mind that this country's top anti vaxx crusader is Robert Kennedy's son.
I'll admit I could be wrong, but the most logical conclusion we can derive from the current state of affairs (and history) is that there's an international, multi-generational, psychopathic mass murdering plutocratic clique intent on global depopulation and domination.
This attack is happening on multiple fronts, via "healthcare", the culture, finance, food, media, etc., and has been going on since at least the 1800's (and probably far longer). They operate by infiltration, subversion, threats, murder, and blackmail (often pedo-sexual).
Once you accept there's an "elite" group of plutocrats (e.g. the WEF) trying to kill you things get very clear.
There is an Elite which has more connectedness to elitists in other countries than they have with their own people. This was true for monarchs back in the middle ages as well.
There are intel agencies who try to compromise the potentially powerful with embarassing sexual incidents. This was routine for the KGB back in the day. As sexual mores have declined, they had to switch to underage bait for sufficient blackmail potential.
And yes, we live in times that resemble the scenario in C.S. Lewis' "That Hideous Strength."
But there is plenty of history of corporations poisoning people because those poisons happened to be very handy. CFCs and leaded gasoline were very useful chemicals. The creator of these chemicals absolutely knew that tetraethyl lead was dangerous; he got sick from it himself. He marketed it anyway because it made him a shit ton of money. Greed isn't always good.
Leaded gasoline got banned except for aviation gas. CFCs are being phased out. The EPA had bipartisan support when it was created. There is ample precedent for fixing this sort of problem.
The big challenge is convincing Republicans that they are shooting themselves in the foot by reflexively siding with big corporations. The EPA and the FDA can be royal pains in the ass, after all. But sometimes they serve critically useful functions.
The big challenge is getting around the global warming issue. There are plenty of reactionary elements within the environmental movement, but the Republicans have dug in their heels on the global warming threat. This heel digging makes first order sense, as global warming is a looming threat, not a crisis; and the solutions proposed by the Left are utterly moronic. But the key to winning the game of 4D chess is to come up with non-moronic solutions vs. deny the threat. Internal combustion engines can run on methanol. Indy cars used methanol back in the 70s. Methanol can be made from carbon dioxide and hydrogen gas. The remaining issue is where to get the electricity to make the hydrogen: solar? wind? thorium breeder reactors? or wait until we get fusion?
All valid points, but I think you need to go bigger, e.g.:
"But there is plenty of history of corporations poisoning people because those poisons happened to be very handy. CFCs and leaded gasoline were very useful chemicals. The creator of these chemicals absolutely knew that tetraethyl lead was dangerous; he got sick from it himself. He marketed it anyway because it made him a shit ton of money. Greed isn't always good."
Plenty of "health care" CEO's took the clotshot as well. Not everybody's in "the club", and "the club" isn't particularly interested in preserving members/aspiring members IMO. They're raving psychopaths, and are happy to eat their own. It's one reason they're losing, and will lose.
"The big challenge is convincing Republicans that they are shooting themselves in the foot by reflexively siding with big corporations. The EPA and the FDA can be royal pains in the ass, after all. But sometimes they serve critically useful functions."
While not as odious as Democraps, Repugnantcans are still plenty odious. This goes far beyond party politics. IMO the only way to succeed is to form sub-polities and raise up local elites to better positions, a la Neema Parvini (The Populist Delusion), and Hans Herman Hoppe (What Must Be Done).
"The big challenge is getting around the global warming issue."
We're heading into a mini-ice age so this won't be an issue in that sense, heheheh
> My intuition says that there is something real going on. I hear stories through my personal network that are consistent with a growth in autism.
At our local church, my wife and I run the nursery, taking care of toddler-aged kids so their parents can enjoy Sunday School in peace. Out of 10 kids at our current class, 2 of them are not speaking, both closing in fast on their 3rd birthdays. (Per normal child development, they should start talking somewhere between 10-18 months.) They also don't respond to being called by name.
I know. Small sample size and all the usual caveats. Still. 30 years ago you'd have never seen anything even close to 20%, even in a small sample!
Sometimes I trust anecdotes more than studies -- especially when the number of anecdotes is huge.
But in this case the anecdotes agree with the official studies. It's the Redditards who are in science denial mode.